Monday, 7 February 2011

in which i suggest tony blair should STFU

i've had a longer than expected break from blogging over the last week, because real life has taken over my available time. i have family visiting from overseas, so would much rather spend my time offline at the moment. i haven't been very good at keeping up with the news, though was sad to hear about the violence against protesters in egypt. despite this, the protesters are carrying on and i hope they are able to force through the change they seek.

i'm quite mindful of not using swear words on my blog, but i have been sorely tempted to tell tony blair exactly where to go after hearing about his support for hosni mubarak. as if this person hasn't caused enough misery in the world with his support of the invasion and occupation of iraq (along with a whole lot of other things), he now wants to tell us that we shouldn't allow the egyptian people to choose their preferred government because the wrong party might get in.

now why does that sound so familiar? oh yes, that's right, it was exactly the same response when the palestinians voted in the "wrong" party. in tony blair's world, democracy should only be allowed when the people choose what he thinks is the right group. fortunately he doesn't have much power at the moment, and certainly not a lot of goodwill, but i'm so sick of people who will criticise (and invade) arab states because they don't have democracy, but will also try to prevent democratic change from happening with every bit of strength they have. hypocrisy much?

in any case, mr blair needs a very strong dose of STFU and a reminder that he is now an irrelevancy. particularly in the face of millions of people willing to put their lives on the line in order to have the right to choose their own leaders.

in other news, i have a shiny new laptop & am now using firefox. as i've mentioned many times before, i'm very much a technophobe, so these are reasonable changes for me. it's wonderful to have an IT expert in the family to help me navigate it all. i should be used to it all by the end of the week.

also, next week i start four days of human rights training run by the human rights commission. i'v written about this previously at the hand mirror, and i'm really looking forward to it. it will be quite a change from accountancy, that's for sure.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Bottom line is that true Feminists like Boudicca had honour or engaged in the fight for the vote. Today's feminists are tools of the Frankfurt School social theorists.

After failing to radicalise the German working class as Internationalist (they became National Socialists NOT Internationalists) the Frankfurt Schoolers fled to the US (to escapr Hitler)where they were given tenure at Columbia University.

In the 1950's they attempted to radicalise the American worker - again they failed. Why? Because generally workers were paid well for their work.

They then formed the hypothesis that the white male European/Anglo-American was suspect from a revolutionary they looked for a new constituency to radicalise:

- Women
- Homosexuals
- The youth (the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world
- Non-whites (and white Jews)

This is when Herbert Marcuse headlined a revisef version of Frankfurt School critical theory called ' The Theory of Polymorphic Perversity' i.e. if it feels good do it!

In essence the theorists believed that:

- The white male needed to be destroyed as he represented the un-radicalised worker.

- The Church need to be destroyed as this promoted understanding across the classes and false class-consciousness.

- The family needed to be destroyed as this created an alternative to the State in terms of transmitting values to the young, private property, individualism as opposed to collectivism and loyalty

In their own words they said 'we will make the West so corrupt it stinks'. Haven't they done well? Ever ask yourself why Critical Theory is taught on EVERY Uni course in the West... it is an inter-generational plan to implement a 1930's worldview... why? Simples. Cultural Marxists state that a matriarchal society is a necessary 'precursor' state to the state of anarchy required before socialism can be implemented. They also state that males, once subjugated by legislation, will rise up and destroy the matriarchy and it is they who will institute socialism as they believe it to have been their saviour (and not the originator of the matriachy they destroyed).

So the Left think that us women are 'useful idiots'!!!

The next phase can then be running the show as per(after all 9 out of 10 Frankfurt Schoolers were male) and breeding consigned to ArtSem dormitories...dystopian I know but this is what they themselves have stated on the public record!

So the moral of the story is that some women and some men are natural allies AND some men and some women really are the enemy of humanity.

Why should we trade the gains of our ancestresses for a generation or two wielding man-hatred power (on behalf of totalitarians)???

Or should that be TotalitariaNZ.

Peace Sisters x